Underwater Hockey World Forums  

Go Back   Underwater Hockey World Forums > The Game > Underwater Hockey Rules & Laws
Register Photos FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Underwater Hockey Rules & Laws Discuss the rules & laws of the UWH Game here.


Rule Amendments for CMAS

Underwater Hockey Rules & Laws


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)   IP: 144.195.6.10
Old 14-11-07, 10:12 AM
Tuck's Avatar
Tuck Tuck is offline
Moderator
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: California, USofA
Posts: 312
Rep Power: 3
Tuck is on a distinguished road
Carl, it’s a complicated question really. Historically the rules for UWH have had changes suggested at the WC (usually by the country rules rep) in meetings discussed voted on, then enacted in a rules update to be enforced for the next WC. What Carol has asked for is basically the request for rules changes that normally is supposed to go out in some form of communication from the countries’ rules organizer or some other rep to the population they want to here from. Carol is going straight to the source, and trying to get out to the entire affected population posting on small list serves, hockeynet, and here (at least) to ask the question and following up, I think it was first posted a couple months ago, I know I have a couple emails from July about it. This is so they can get organized and put in a format to be voted on in Durban.

Tony is essentially doing the same thing for CMAS, but not sure what the process will be, maybe just re-written and published.

Who OWNS rules to any sport? There are organizations that oversee and publish them, then enforce them at their competitions, FIFA, RLIF etc... whatever; but own?

I guess this is the first step in creating Underwater Hockey League and Underwater Hockey Union. er... snorkel battle extreme (sorry liam most of the pools I play are outside) Lets see how long the two stay in anyway similar.
__________________
An aquifer is a water bearing layer of rock or soil. Aquifers are separated by impermeable layers of rock or clay called an aquitard. Aquitard, however may sound a bit offensive to some, and therefore we will be changing the name to Aquachallenge.

Last edited by Tuck : 14-11-07 at 10:27 AM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Reddit! Google Bookmark this Post!Stumble this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)   IP: 207.200.116.201
Old 14-11-07, 03:35 PM
Carol Rose Carol Rose is offline
Dolphin
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: So San Francisco CA USA
Posts: 326
Rep Power: 2
Carol Rose is on a distinguished road
Wink who ism?

Quote:
Originally Posted by CarlK View Post
Why are both CMAS and WAA both asking for rules submissions?
It's a little bit of 'me-too-ism' Anyhow, who owns these rules? We have Tony & Carol both in this thread. Who owns the resulting rules?
Since 1990, I have asked for rule changes for the biennial rules meeting. And WAA now has own rules thread, so I am outa here ............
__________________
Carol Rose
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Reddit! Google Bookmark this Post!Stumble this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)   IP: 207.200.116.201
Old 14-11-07, 03:43 PM
Carol Rose Carol Rose is offline
Dolphin
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: So San Francisco CA USA
Posts: 326
Rep Power: 2
Carol Rose is on a distinguished road
Red face Rule changes

Quote:
Originally Posted by atapene View Post
who will end up with a better set of rules?

to be truthful i thought the goal subbing thing was so obviously sensible it was going to be a gimme in the next set of rules, after being trialled successfully at sheffield.

trial successfully at worlds.... surely next worlds its in concrete. or is that not the case?
Rule changes are not automatic. A rule change or addition or whatever must be voted either at the biennial rules meeting held at WC or between WCs by postal vote. Rule changes passed unanimiously at a WC rules meeting can be implemented immediately upon notification and agreement of teams cpts present. Process to change rules is in current WAA rules.

I don't believe one set or another of rules will be 'better' but will be different.

I am now leaving this thread as it is not my balleywick. Rule proposals for WAA now has own thread, see you there.
__________________
Carol Rose
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Reddit! Google Bookmark this Post!Stumble this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)   IP: 210.54.213.48
Old 14-11-07, 04:20 PM
atapene's Avatar
atapene atapene is offline
Moderator
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: auckland, new zealand
Posts: 818
Rep Power: 3
atapene will become famous soon enough
...so a quick vote at worlds will see the subbing rule set in concrete. easy.
__________________
it's more polite on the grating than on the subs bench
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Reddit! Google Bookmark this Post!Stumble this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)   IP: 84.24.137.3
Old 14-11-07, 07:19 PM
Sven's Avatar
Sven Sven is offline
Moderator
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Netherlands / Tilburg
Posts: 1,152
Rep Power: 3
Sven is on a distinguished road
Why different rule chances?
Keep both the same rules.

So there will be not real split in the sport.
It will be the same sport/rules in cemas and the others..
And it will be differcult when 2 sorts rules to have games/toernaments between teh 2 federations.
__________________
When you are good, then you are not bad..
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Reddit! Google Bookmark this Post!Stumble this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)   IP: 121.73.55.166
Old 14-11-07, 09:31 PM
freedivenz freedivenz is offline
Been Around
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 95
Rep Power: 2
freedivenz is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sven View Post
Why different rule chances?
Keep both the same rules.

So there will be not real split in the sport.
It will be the same sport/rules in cemas and the others..
And it will be differcult when 2 sorts rules to have games/toernaments between teh 2 federations.
Even the other sports that CMAS has which have other governing bodies have slightly different rules. The ones I know about are spearfishing and freediving, but none of it fundamentally changes the sport. Having free subbing in one and not the other won't make switching between them impossible
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Reddit! Google Bookmark this Post!Stumble this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)   IP: 84.24.137.3
Old 14-11-07, 10:03 PM
Sven's Avatar
Sven Sven is offline
Moderator
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Netherlands / Tilburg
Posts: 1,152
Rep Power: 3
Sven is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by freedivenz View Post
Even the other sports that CMAS has which have other governing bodies have slightly different rules. The ones I know about are spearfishing and freediving, but none of it fundamentally changes the sport. Having free subbing in one and not the other won't make switching between them impossible

Iff it stay's by only that chance your right.
But by every new chance the game will be a little different.
and after a few chances its a differend game.

A sort of link between the rules is maybe better to keep the games/play a little bit like each other. Iff you dont do that. after a time it will be a real splitt between the federations. And that does not make the sport better and bigger.
__________________
When you are good, then you are not bad..
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Reddit! Google Bookmark this Post!Stumble this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)   IP: 66.121.19.142
Old 16-11-07, 08:16 AM
Duck's Avatar
Duck Duck is offline
Great White Shark
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: California
Posts: 525
Rep Power: 0
Duck is an unknown quantity at this point
Sounds like that might be up to the countries that send teams to both WAA and the other federation (new rule: I only say the name in my signature). If one offers up a rule that makes sense I'm sure it would make its way into the other set. Unless egos start driving the decision makers.
__________________
Just in case you weren't sure, it's official -- CMAS sucks.
Oh yeah, and now they're broke.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Reddit! Google Bookmark this Post!Stumble this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)   IP: 82.173.5.82
Old 16-11-07, 08:35 AM
Sven's Avatar
Sven Sven is offline
Moderator
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Netherlands / Tilburg
Posts: 1,152
Rep Power: 3
Sven is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duck View Post
Sounds like that might be up to the countries that send teams to both WAA and the other federation (new rule: I only say the name in my signature). If one offers up a rule that makes sense I'm sure it would make its way into the other set. Unless egos start driving the decision makers.
Every desision driven by any ego is wrong. A desision must be driven by the interest to make the sport better. I think every desision must be putt up by both the WAA and Cemas. To keep the sport likely like each other. with so little as possible differents..
__________________
When you are good, then you are not bad..
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Reddit! Google Bookmark this Post!Stumble this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)   IP: 74.2.154.205
Old 16-11-07, 01:33 PM
Tan's Avatar
Tan Tan is offline
Moderator
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Heart - Australia, Actual Self - The Netherlands
Posts: 143
Rep Power: 0
Tan is an unknown quantity at this point
The rule stating that we have to wear a specific type of external mouth gaurd;
that is not designed for our sport and that people have lost teeth wearing should definitely be changed!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Reddit! Google Bookmark this Post!Stumble this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 07:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
© Chumba 2007

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31