Underwater Hockey World Forums  

Go Back   Underwater Hockey World Forums > The Game > Underwater Hockey Formation and Tactics
Register Photos FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Underwater Hockey Formation and Tactics The Web Book on UWH Tactics


Penalty SHOTS

Underwater Hockey Formation and Tactics


View Poll Results: What would be ok in a penalty shot if you knock it down?
It is never ok, it should always be a penalty goal because of illegal knock down. 4 21.05%
It is ok if you do not move and they shoot the puck into you. 13 68.42%
It is ok to knock down the puck with your body because it's the shooters fault they have a bad shot. 2 10.53%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 19. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)   IP: 204.191.200.180
Old 29-11-07, 05:36 PM
fryersuwh's Avatar
fryersuwh fryersuwh is offline
Been Around
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Calgary, Alberta, CANADA
Posts: 64
Rep Power: 0
fryersuwh
Quote:
Originally Posted by atapene View Post
all of the refs to use the same interpretation.

this can be done at the refs meeting before any major (or minor) comp.
Hahaha thats funny
because i know of a few different refs that would call the same play differently. ive even seen 2 world refs argue about it before.

thats what needs to be done the talk about...the movement of the player...standing your ground on the shot...having to move out of the way if you are able to. There needs to be that BASE that EVERYONE KNOWS so there is no confusion and if 2 refs saw something hopefully they would be able to make the SAME CALL.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Reddit! Google Bookmark this Post!Stumble this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #32 (permalink)   IP: 210.54.213.48
Old 29-11-07, 06:06 PM
atapene's Avatar
atapene atapene is offline
Moderator
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: auckland, new zealand
Posts: 818
Rep Power: 3
atapene will become famous soon enough
...this can be done at the refs meeting before any major (or minor) comp
__________________
it's more polite on the grating than on the subs bench
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Reddit! Google Bookmark this Post!Stumble this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)   IP: 122.105.222.47
Old 29-11-07, 10:53 PM
Nicky Nicky is offline
Been Around
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 79
Rep Power: 0
Nicky is an unknown quantity at this point
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duck View Post
Yeah, cuz the middle upper leg still has complete flexibility to swipe at the puck so defining the upper upper leg which has no such flexibility (unless maybe your thumbs are double jointed) as a foul makes sense. I think the flexibility ends at the lower upper upper leg which is just a hair above the middle upper leg.
I was actually trying to pre-empt a slightly different brand of nitpicking to this where people might suggest that being hit by the puck 1 inch below your hip counts as being hit in the leg and would hence be a foul, but cheers for that one.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Reddit! Google Bookmark this Post!Stumble this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #34 (permalink)   IP: 66.121.19.142
Old 30-11-07, 04:16 AM
Duck's Avatar
Duck Duck is offline
Great White Shark
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: California
Posts: 525
Rep Power: 0
Duck is an unknown quantity at this point
Just one of the beauties of interpretation.
__________________
Just in case you weren't sure, it's official -- CMAS sucks.
Oh yeah, and now they're broke.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Reddit! Google Bookmark this Post!Stumble this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #35 (permalink)   IP: 204.191.200.180
Old 30-11-07, 04:52 AM
fryersuwh's Avatar
fryersuwh fryersuwh is offline
Been Around
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Calgary, Alberta, CANADA
Posts: 64
Rep Power: 0
fryersuwh
Quote:
Originally Posted by atapene View Post
...this can be done at the refs meeting before any major (or minor) comp
No it shouldnt be something that should be just done for tournaments it should be the same basis for the whole world.... Otherwise different countries would play the puck differently and might get called at worlds but in their home its ok to do that. This needs to be a Worldwide setting so we do not need to change our style of play for every different tournament
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Reddit! Google Bookmark this Post!Stumble this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #36 (permalink)   IP: 66.121.19.142
Old 30-11-07, 07:55 AM
Duck's Avatar
Duck Duck is offline
Great White Shark
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: California
Posts: 525
Rep Power: 0
Duck is an unknown quantity at this point
Right. That's what Liam is saying. But I'll break it down for ya. Before every tournament at the refs meeting the subject could and should be talked about. He didn't say just explain how it's going to get called at this tournament. But explain it the same way at every tournament so that all refs are on the same page by... well, let's say 2032 just to be safe.
__________________
Just in case you weren't sure, it's official -- CMAS sucks.
Oh yeah, and now they're broke.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Reddit! Google Bookmark this Post!Stumble this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #37 (permalink)   IP: 204.191.200.180
Old 30-11-07, 05:29 PM
fryersuwh's Avatar
fryersuwh fryersuwh is offline
Been Around
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Calgary, Alberta, CANADA
Posts: 64
Rep Power: 0
fryersuwh
Ok but I dont care if its just discussed all the time. Its the different kind of discussions....Like at one trouanment they might discuss calling it one way and at another tournament they might call it another. To take out the different kind of calling everywhere and not having to explaing it all the time it should have a "guideline" in the rulebook. This generalizes it better so Everyone in the World knows the basis.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Reddit! Google Bookmark this Post!Stumble this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #38 (permalink)   IP: 83.84.250.232
Old 30-11-07, 09:29 PM
Jols's Avatar
Jols Jols is offline
Dolphin
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 325
Rep Power: 2
Jols is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tuck View Post
That is a different case. You are describing Shephearding or Obstruction, which is essentially interfenece, playing the player not the puck. Both Soccer and Ice Hockey have rules against the same thing more or less. Liam is talking about something more akin to incedental handball in soccer. If someone kicks a ball at you point blank and it rockets off your arm it is not considered a hand ball right? Should be the same here right?
I admit that I was making a point, but the general principle is the same I think.

There is never going to be a rule here that makes everyone happy. Clever players will always look to take advantage of every loophole they think they see in the rules, whether that is leaving their legs hanging to block a shot in one case, or purposely throwing at the defenders legs in the other.

On the other hand... I have never understood why it is not called dangerous play when someone flicks into the legs of the defender. Having my kneecap shattered by a lead puck would be considered dangerous in my book.

Banning flicking may be a solution. It would also remove a potential hazard from the game and would mean we don't have to invest in mouthguards as well.
__________________
Faster than a speeding puck...

Last edited by Jols : 01-12-07 at 12:13 AM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Reddit! Google Bookmark this Post!Stumble this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #39 (permalink)   IP: 83.84.250.232
Old 30-11-07, 09:33 PM
Jols's Avatar
Jols Jols is offline
Dolphin
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 325
Rep Power: 2
Jols is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by fryersuwh View Post
Ok but I dont care if its just discussed all the time. Its the different kind of discussions....Like at one trouanment they might discuss calling it one way and at another tournament they might call it another. To take out the different kind of calling everywhere and not having to explaing it all the time it should have a "guideline" in the rulebook. This generalizes it better so Everyone in the World knows the basis.
I like the idea of guidelines for the refs to be able to interpret the game more consistently across geo's. Some enterprising ref should start a website with video examples (a picture is worth a thousand words) and the interpretation of the play from the world chief ref.

If they need material I can find any number of examples of misinterpretation from my video collection.
__________________
Faster than a speeding puck...

Last edited by Jols : 01-12-07 at 12:11 AM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Reddit! Google Bookmark this Post!Stumble this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #40 (permalink)   IP: 144.195.6.10
Old 01-12-07, 04:49 AM
Tuck's Avatar
Tuck Tuck is offline
Moderator
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: California, USofA
Posts: 312
Rep Power: 3
Tuck is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jols View Post
I like the idea of guidelines for the refs to be able to interpret the game more consistently across geo's. Some enterprising ref should start a website with video examples (a picture is worth a thousand words) and the interpretation of the play from the world chief ref.

If they need material I can find any number of examples of misinterpretation from my video collection.
Great Idea!! Duck actually asked for this to get started brom various folks in the US several months ago. There was a lot of energy early and I'm not sure what if anything has happened. I think collecting and putting together good and bad video clips might be a start. There is the French site with loads of small clips some of which have examples of fouls. I'm too lazy to look for the link right now.
__________________
An aquifer is a water bearing layer of rock or soil. Aquifers are separated by impermeable layers of rock or clay called an aquitard. Aquitard, however may sound a bit offensive to some, and therefore we will be changing the name to Aquachallenge.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Reddit! Google Bookmark this Post!Stumble this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 07:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
© Chumba 2007

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31