![]() |
| |||||||
| Underwater Hockey Formation and Tactics The Web Book on UWH Tactics |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| ||||
| Sven, for your #2 going at the defense, straight up the pool from inside the 6M, usually results in an immediate attack on that player by a relatively rested opponent, a probable stop, and the opposition swimming the puck back into the 3M. While your guy is swimming the puck out of the 6M you usually have backs that are surfacing after a series of big effort stops so going right at one of the freshest opponents in the pool surely isn't the smartest approach. Your red arrows at the top of the 6 should aim out to the side more. There are exceptions to everything except when dealing with 'there are exceptions to everything' so I know at times it will work to go straight up pool. But in what looks like a suggested method of operations that shouldn't be suggested.
__________________ Just in case you weren't sure, it's official -- CMAS sucks. Oh yeah, and now they're broke. |
| ||||
| Quote:
And that its an exeption...to go that way.(red arrows) But there is nothing wrong when you tell your players to use the weak points iff they can from the opponents. And i really like it iff they break out in a straight line away forwards when possible.. and not automaticly swim to the other corner and so keep the pressure on the defence. So its good to tell them its an option when you get the puck in the 6 meter line. But indeed you must tell its an exeption and the dangers you told here, you must tell that also. Thats why i ended that line with the words "if the weakpoint off the offencive team is on that point." If the fresh players from the offencive team are there its not the weakest point.
__________________ When you are good, then you are not bad.. Last edited by Sven : 20-07-07 at 05:07 AM. |
| ||||
| ...any particular reason why the wee arrows pointing to your oppositions goal veer outwards and aim for the corners of the bin rather than the center of the goal svensy? is that a typo or is it a special tactical ploy?
__________________ it's more polite on the grating than on the subs bench |
| ||||
| Quote:
a forward should drive the puck to the opposite side of the oppositions bin so that as the defence puts pressure on you,you will end up pushing it into the centre. but if you drive it into the centre then the defensive pressure will probably push you wide on the other side of their bin,thus covering their bin and forcing the puck into the back wall. benson,can you remember this,or could you advise us on this ?
__________________ top of de mornin to yeh |
| ||||
| Something like that... If you swim for the near corner of the goal bin the puck almost always ends up on the back wall. If you swim for the far corner of the goal bin you offset the defence's positioning, create space and open a wider window for attacking the goal.
__________________ It's not whether you win or lose - but whether I win or lose. |
| ||||
| I like the "high-way" diagrams Sven and it's the first time I've seen a diagram with the side-subbing taken into account. The commentators at the worlds often mentioned that the womens and juniors teams in particular tended to play near the sub benches to enable quick subbing! I found that annoying (insulting?) as we never discussed that as an intentional play. Have any of you used this as part of your strategy? Really?
__________________ Off Half-Backs Rule |
| ||||
| Used?? or been berated by the coach for not implementing it? Well both actually. Not as an out and out strategy but something to keep in mind. Look they've had a man in the sin bin for 5 of the last 6 minutes lets really make the push to the far wall away from the sub box. As well, when possible clearing the puck, one might prefer to swim to the sub-box side. That way your teammats are all clsoer to get fresh subs in shile its stalled on the wall, then you can pop up into the sub box right from teh bottom.
__________________ An aquifer is a water bearing layer of rock or soil. Aquifers are separated by impermeable layers of rock or clay called an aquitard. Aquitard, however may sound a bit offensive to some, and therefore we will be changing the name to Aquachallenge. |