Awwww… so I can’t just throw something completely vague and nebulous out there and expect others to understand what I want and ask the questions I want? Damn now I have to think! :?

Ok,
WTD, can you briefly explain what was topic 11.1 on the CMAS GA agenda AIDA/CMAS, and your thoughts on why something that seemed to be a win-win for AIDA AND CMAS would have been voted down? And does this set a precedent for how CMAS will treat WAA competitors?

What impact to our sport and participation, if any, especially from those European nations like France, Italy, Spain, etc… who maybe more intimately married to CMAS does that decision have, in regards to SA 2008 and beyond?

As I think I understand the ruling was in regards to ONLY individual athletes and to only dynamic apnea, where AIDA athletes can compete in separate different events that CMAS does not offer and not be banned from competition.
A) Does this mean CMAS will not take action against federations for participation in AIDA or more to our point WAA events?
B) Does this mean WAA being not “Underwater Hockey” is sufficient to side step the whole banning of athletes issue and not affect those who might compete in a future CMAS UWH events, ie. CMAS games 2009 or European championships?

Thanks,
-Scott